Request for Manual Review – Device ID/CID Match
Dear FundingPips Responsible Trading Team,
Thank you for conducting the additional review and for acknowledging my explanation.
I respectfully request one final manual review of my case, as I believe there may be an important distinction between the Device ID evidence and the actual operation of my accounts.
All of the FundingPips accounts involved in my trading activity were registered under my own name and identity. I did not give my accounts to another person to operate or manage.
I had four $5K FundingPips accounts in total:
1. One $5K account was my Lead account.
2. The other three $5K accounts were connected as Follower accounts through the Trade Copier.
3. All four accounts belonged to me and were registered under my own identity.
4. The three Follower accounts automatically received trades from my Lead account through the Trade Copier.
Therefore, I did not need to manually log into each Follower account every time a trade was executed. The trades were automatically copied from my Lead account.
Regarding the Device ID/CID match with another registered user, I would like to reiterate that the device associated with my account had previously belonged to another person. That person had used the device before it came into my possession and had used FundingPips on that device.
Therefore, I believe there is a legitimate historical explanation for why the same physical device could be associated with both users.
I am not disputing that your system detected a Device ID match. My concern is that the Device ID match appears to have been treated as evidence of prohibited account operation without sufficiently distinguishing between:
1. Previous use of the physical device by another person.
2. Automated Trade Copier activity between my own accounts.
3. An actual manual login or operation of an account belonging to another user.
I respectfully request clarification on the following points:
- Which specific account generated the Device ID/CID match?
- What were the exact date and time of the relevant login/session events?
- Does the CID evidence represent an actual manual login from the device?
- Can automated MT5 or Trade Copier activity generate or associate such CID/login evidence?
- Were my three Follower accounts considered a breach because trades were automatically copied from my Lead account, even though all four accounts were registered under my own name?
- What specific evidence establishes that another registered user was operating my account?
I respectfully request that my case be reviewed based on the actual account ownership, login/session records, timestamps, and trading activity rather than the Device ID match alone.
I fully understand and respect FundingPips' compliance and fair-trading requirements. My intention is only to ensure that the technical evidence has been correctly interpreted in the context of my account structure and the previous history of the device.
I kindly request a final senior-level manual review of my case and reconsideration of the termination decision if the evidence does not establish prohibited third-party operation.
I am willing to provide any additional information or supporting evidence required regarding the device history, account ownership, or Trade Copier setup.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Kind regards,
Divyanshu Yadav
Registered Email: divyanshhyadav007@gmail.com